3 ms·
There's probably bit of hardware lot it with Intel chips. Since they control the hardware, Apple probably has invested quite a bit into hardware specific optimi
by uponcoffee 7y ago
There's probably bit of hardware lot it with Intel chips. Since they control the hardware, Apple probably has invested quite a bit into hardware specific optimizations that won't readily port to AMD chipsets.
Also, AMD is only recently been a performance front runner - they might not hold on to that for long. In the short term it doesn't make sense to jump ship.
For for general computation/ecosystems or for generation/device specific ventures (e.g. Consoles) it makes sense to turn with the tides.
- stcredzero 7y agoSince they control the hardware, Apple probably has invested quite a bit into hardware specific optimizations that won't readily port to AMD chipsets. It's in Apple's history to be able to move on from hardware. It's also in their history to make the wrong choices, necessitating the move.
- zamalek 7y agoIntel hasn't manufacturered bespoke chips for some years now, which is why all, but one, mainstream consoles have been AMD.
- kllrnohj 7y agoFunnily enough the only "bespoke" Intel chip in recent times was Intel's own i7-8705G & i7-8809G used in the Hades Canyon NUC that replaced Intel's HD graphics with an AMD Vega M.
- ZeroCool2u 7y agoWhich was an amazing chip. The Vega M + Intel cores combo delivered the graphics performance that Intel has been promising for years now. Would have loved to see a chip like that power the next few generations of ultrabooks, MBP's, etc.