3 ms·

> I mean beating a chessmaster was considered (at one point, and by some) to be the defining point where AI could be defined as Intelligent. We had some pretty

> I mean beating a chessmaster was considered (at one point, and by some) to be the defining point where AI could be defined as Intelligent. We had some pretty goofy ideas on what intelligence looked like and required back in the day. But I do think we realized that beating a chess grandmaster wasn't the defining point of intelligence, well before a chess program actually beat a grandmaster.

tempguy9999 7y ago
> goofy ideas [...] back in the day Do you mean they looked goofy back then, or only in hindsight? My point is not about chess or racism but how we justify things, and the implied question of why we have to justify things to make ourselves look good.