3 ms·
> They later tell us they believed that datacentre was introducing the corruption What now? Their datacentre was ... rewriting (presumably) encrypted packets?
by peteretep 7y ago
> They later tell us they believed that datacentre was introducing the corruption
What now? Their datacentre was ... rewriting (presumably) encrypted packets?
- robinson-wall 7y agoSorry, perhaps this isn't very clear as I've tried to simplify the explanation to make it accessible to a wide audience. What I meant here is they could tell that the corruption was being introduced by some component in their infrastructure, and they were only observing it for messages passing through one of their two active-active sites.
- noir_lord 7y agoI understood that as you intended. It's a fine line between understandable to laymen and people been pernickity sadly.