4 ms·

I don't mind the killing off of stuff that doesn't catches on it's a mark of dynamism.

• underdown 7y ago
  After a while it starts looking like a bloodbath
• mattkevan 7y ago
  It suggests a lack of focus, and gives users a reason to not trust their products. Why should I adopt service n when it's probably going to be shut down in 12-18 months, after the launch of service n+1?
  • fyoving 7y ago
    Not really, adopting these apps is usually a modest investment on the users' part.
  • sowbug 7y ago
    You shouldn't, because you're a member of the early majority, late majority, or laggards, in Crossing the Chasm terms. Innovators and early adopters are more comfortable trying out a startup's offering that might be imperfect or might fail. Most people are conservative like you. Your sheer numbers are why crossing the chasm is so important for the long-term survival of a new offering.
    • mattkevan 7y ago
      Quite a pointed you there. Thanks for that. I love discovering and trying out innovative new products, and have made it a large part of what I do professionally. However, some offerings I take more seriously than others. With Google, if it's not search, data or ad related (i.e. the stuff that makes them money), it's generally the case it's not going to be around long-term.
• _jal 7y ago
  In a backhanded way, neither do I. When Google Reader died, it reminded me not to become dependent on other peoples' computers. I had gotten lazy and was attracted to a well done tool, and it dying was a helpful reminder that I'd been suckered, and was lucky it wasn't something more important. I've been better at not making that mistake since.