8 ms·

Feels like the same people responsible for Mircrosoft's product decisions in the 2000s have now all moved to Google, with a slight twist in strategy. When a Mi

Feels like the same people responsible for Mircrosoft's product decisions in the 2000s have now all moved to Google, with a slight twist in strategy. When a Microsoft product didn't do well they called it something different and relaunched, hoping no-one realised it was the same old thing – e.g. Zune Music/Xbox Music/MSN Music/Groove Music/Microsoft Store etc. Google now* just kills it and launches something else, sometimes more than one, hoping no-one remembers the still-cooling corpse of the previous attempt. For example, they're now on their ninth attempt [0] at a messaging service with no end in sight. *Google Now is also dead. [0]https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2019/06/google-ninth-attempt-at-a-messaging-service-will-be-based-on-rcs/ https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2019/06/google-ninth-attempt...

fyoving 7y ago
I don't mind the killing off of stuff that doesn't catches on it's a mark of dynamism.
- underdown 7y ago
  After a while it starts looking like a bloodbath
- mattkevan 7y ago
  It suggests a lack of focus, and gives users a reason to not trust their products. Why should I adopt service n when it's probably going to be shut down in 12-18 months, after the launch of service n+1?
  - fyoving 7y ago
    Not really, adopting these apps is usually a modest investment on the users' part.
  - sowbug 7y ago
    You shouldn't, because you're a member of the early majority, late majority, or laggards, in Crossing the Chasm terms. Innovators and early adopters are more comfortable trying out a startup's offering that might be imperfect or might fail. Most people are conservative like you. Your sheer numbers are why crossing the chasm is so important for the long-term survival of a new offering.
    - mattkevan 7y ago
      Quite a pointed you there. Thanks for that. I love discovering and trying out innovative new products, and have made it a large part of what I do professionally. However, some offerings I take more seriously than others. With Google, if it's not search, data or ad related (i.e. the stuff that makes them money), it's generally the case it's not going to be around long-term.
- _jal 7y ago
  In a backhanded way, neither do I. When Google Reader died, it reminded me not to become dependent on other peoples' computers. I had gotten lazy and was attracted to a well done tool, and it dying was a helpful reminder that I'd been suckered, and was lucky it wasn't something more important. I've been better at not making that mistake since.
x86_64Ubuntu 7y ago
Is there a list of Google services somewhere? I'm always astonished at how I only hear of SOO many of their services only in their obituary.
- WalterSear 7y ago
  Not the list you are looking for: https://gcemetery.co/ https://gcemetery.co/
- CondensedBrain 7y ago
  There's a whole Wikipedia page for it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Google_products https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Google_products

fyoving 7y ago

I don't mind the killing off of stuff that doesn't catches on it's a mark of dynamism.

underdown 7y ago
After a while it starts looking like a bloodbath
mattkevan 7y ago
It suggests a lack of focus, and gives users a reason to not trust their products. Why should I adopt service n when it's probably going to be shut down in 12-18 months, after the launch of service n+1?
- fyoving 7y ago
  Not really, adopting these apps is usually a modest investment on the users' part.
- sowbug 7y ago
  You shouldn't, because you're a member of the early majority, late majority, or laggards, in Crossing the Chasm terms. Innovators and early adopters are more comfortable trying out a startup's offering that might be imperfect or might fail. Most people are conservative like you. Your sheer numbers are why crossing the chasm is so important for the long-term survival of a new offering.
  - mattkevan 7y ago
    Quite a pointed you there. Thanks for that. I love discovering and trying out innovative new products, and have made it a large part of what I do professionally. However, some offerings I take more seriously than others. With Google, if it's not search, data or ad related (i.e. the stuff that makes them money), it's generally the case it's not going to be around long-term.
_jal 7y ago
In a backhanded way, neither do I. When Google Reader died, it reminded me not to become dependent on other peoples' computers. I had gotten lazy and was attracted to a well done tool, and it dying was a helpful reminder that I'd been suckered, and was lucky it wasn't something more important. I've been better at not making that mistake since.

x86_64Ubuntu 7y ago

Is there a list of Google services somewhere? I'm always astonished at how I only hear of SOO many of their services only in their obituary.

WalterSear 7y ago
Not the list you are looking for: https://gcemetery.co/ https://gcemetery.co/
CondensedBrain 7y ago
There's a whole Wikipedia page for it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Google_products https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Google_products