2 ms·
> not whether or not it exists It seems that you're trying to frame my argument as if I wanted to abolish the state completely, but I have said nothing of the
by golergka 7y ago
> not whether or not it exists
It seems that you're trying to frame my argument as if I wanted to abolish the state completely, but I have said nothing of the sort. Just as you're saying, the question is, in what form should the sate exist. And my answer is, in the most minimal form required to uphold the things that no other institution can.
- SantalBlush 7y agoThe state corrects for market failures, which no other institution can. It can also pool risk much more efficiently than a corporation can. I'd say the current state (US or UK) isn't far off from what you describe.