4 ms·

> It requires shit ton of stuff. No it doesn't. You can build the compiler with `clang v.c` > But the readme says that the UI package does not run on Linux, s

> It requires shit ton of stuff. No it doesn't. You can build the compiler with `clang v.c` > But the readme says that the UI package does not run on Linux, so how can Volt be written in Vlang? The UI package is not available for everyone on Linux yet. Doesn't mean I can't use it. > hot code reloading is not present It will be on June 22. Why do you spread lies and even ask to report me based on these lies? Are you the developer of Odin, who started a similar thread 3 months ago?

kingkong2022 7y ago
SO many comments and questions on this thread, yet you chose to reply on only the ones which point out your hypocrisy and lies that can be seen by everyone. Most of the features listed on your website are not implemented in the compiler as per "your own" readme. > No it doesn't. You can build the compiler with `clang v.c` No one is talking about building the compiler. It is about dependencies required by the V compiler. It is not 400kb without dependencies. It requires clang, and the stdlib requires graphics libraries. You just cannot claim to be 400 kb dependency free. > The UI package is not available for everyone on Linux yet. Doesn't mean I can't use it. I assume Rust like memory management is also available only to you? Because again nobody can see it in the release. Or how do Volt and the 10 other projects you have written in V manage memory? > It will be on June 22. Yeah? People will be waiting to try it out. > Why do you spread lies and even ask to report me based on these lies? Me? Lies? LOL. Me and Andrew both just pointed out the discrepency between the website and the readme. So either the website is wrong or the readme is wrong. If the website is wrong, you are a blatant liar. If the readme is wrong, then why am I not being able to compile V code without clang? > Are you the developer of Odin, who started a similar thread 3 months ago? No I am not. And he probably was the first one to catch your bluff.
- amedvednikov 7y ago
  > It is about dependencies required by the V compiler. V compiler doesn't require glfw or freetype. It doesn't require anything.
- amedvednikov 7y ago
  I think you are. Immediately creating a throwaway, jumping in, and spreading lies, misinformation, just like last time, when I released the playground early.
  - kingkong2022 7y ago
    > pointed out the discrepency between the website and the readme. So either the website is wrong or the readme is wrong. If the website is wrong, you are a blatant liar. If the readme is wrong, then why am I not being able to compile V code without clang? Am I the one spreading misinformation here?
    - amedvednikov 7y ago
      I don't see a single valid discrepency
      - kingkong2022 7y ago
        Lol what? Why did you remove the release then? Isn't that because you want to clean up the readme before re-releasing it? Anyways, I am done talking to you.
        amedvednikov 7y ago
        Yes I delayed the release by 2 days to clean up readme. "Lol"
        lifthrasiir 7y ago
        This is the first time I've ever heard of why the source release was delayed. I have also managed to see the related issue [1], which was posted too late. You should have said at the first time. [2] You have instantly earned much reputation by releasing Volt at the first time; that reputation is much easier to lose as well. People easily gets disappointed, no matter what you have achieved (or think that you can achieved); you should be very careful. Or you can stack much reputation that your mistake or short-sighted action doesn't harm yourself. [1] https://github.com/vlang/v/issues/287 https://github.com/vlang/v/issues/287 [2] Not that I like this form of release. Proprietary languages simply don't work in the modern world.

kingkong2022 7y ago

SO many comments and questions on this thread, yet you chose to reply on only the ones which point out your hypocrisy and lies that can be seen by everyone. Most of the features listed on your website are not implemented in the compiler as per "your own" readme. > No it doesn't. You can build the compiler with `clang v.c` No one is talking about building the compiler. It is about dependencies required by the V compiler. It is not 400kb without dependencies. It requires clang, and the stdlib requires graphics libraries. You just cannot claim to be 400 kb dependency free. > The UI package is not available for everyone on Linux yet. Doesn't mean I can't use it. I assume Rust like memory management is also available only to you? Because again nobody can see it in the release. Or how do Volt and the 10 other projects you have written in V manage memory? > It will be on June 22. Yeah? People will be waiting to try it out. > Why do you spread lies and even ask to report me based on these lies? Me? Lies? LOL. Me and Andrew both just pointed out the discrepency between the website and the readme. So either the website is wrong or the readme is wrong. If the website is wrong, you are a blatant liar. If the readme is wrong, then why am I not being able to compile V code without clang? > Are you the developer of Odin, who started a similar thread 3 months ago? No I am not. And he probably was the first one to catch your bluff.

amedvednikov 7y ago
> It is about dependencies required by the V compiler. V compiler doesn't require glfw or freetype. It doesn't require anything.
amedvednikov 7y ago
I think you are. Immediately creating a throwaway, jumping in, and spreading lies, misinformation, just like last time, when I released the playground early.
- kingkong2022 7y ago
  > pointed out the discrepency between the website and the readme. So either the website is wrong or the readme is wrong. If the website is wrong, you are a blatant liar. If the readme is wrong, then why am I not being able to compile V code without clang? Am I the one spreading misinformation here?
  - amedvednikov 7y ago
    I don't see a single valid discrepency
    - kingkong2022 7y ago
      Lol what? Why did you remove the release then? Isn't that because you want to clean up the readme before re-releasing it? Anyways, I am done talking to you.
      - amedvednikov 7y ago
        Yes I delayed the release by 2 days to clean up readme. "Lol"
        lifthrasiir 7y ago
        This is the first time I've ever heard of why the source release was delayed. I have also managed to see the related issue [1], which was posted too late. You should have said at the first time. [2] You have instantly earned much reputation by releasing Volt at the first time; that reputation is much easier to lose as well. People easily gets disappointed, no matter what you have achieved (or think that you can achieved); you should be very careful. Or you can stack much reputation that your mistake or short-sighted action doesn't harm yourself. [1] https://github.com/vlang/v/issues/287 https://github.com/vlang/v/issues/287 [2] Not that I like this form of release. Proprietary languages simply don't work in the modern world.