6 ms·

Yes, a very good feature set "to have". I think, at this point not even half of them are implemented. The author is doing a major disservice by presenting as if

Yes, a very good feature set "to have". I think, at this point not even half of them are implemented. The author is doing a major disservice by presenting as if everything is complete in the main website.

amedvednikov 7y ago
you can go to vlang.io/play and see for yourself instead of spreading misinformation
- lajawfe 7y ago
  I must clarify, not out of the features listed by GP, but the features listed on the website. No ill will towards you, but the source of all the problems seems to be - how you present the state of language on the website as if it already has all the features noted there. And you seem to have different standards for feature completeness [1], while others expect the feature to be completely implemented, not just a proof of concept with tons of work still required. Again to clarify, I do like the idea behind this language and hope all the best for it. [1] https://twitter.com/8vit_devel/status/1141573808320647168 https://twitter.com/8vit_devel/status/1141573808320647168
kingkong2022 7y ago
Why is this downvoted? Everybody can go to the playground and see that most features are not implemented yet.
- amedvednikov 7y ago
  If by "most" you mean "one" (generics). OK. :D
  - kingkong2022 7y ago
    So apart from all the other stuff mentioned in the thread, there is one more thing now. According to the docs, it is supposed to be released in july. But you already have it showcased in the home page since months. Wow!
    - amedvednikov 7y ago
      But I don't understand. You just said "most" of these don't work. Turns out "most" is 1. And you keep posting after this?
      - kingkong2022 7y ago
        Me & others have already listed out what things don't work. And you still keep posting after all that? Anyways, fuck off now. I don't care enough to reply to you. Neither do I care about the downvotes this comment is going to get because of telling you to do what you deserve. Lets just see how many the features you have on your homepage does your language come with after two days.

amedvednikov 7y ago

you can go to vlang.io/play and see for yourself instead of spreading misinformation

lajawfe 7y ago
I must clarify, not out of the features listed by GP, but the features listed on the website. No ill will towards you, but the source of all the problems seems to be - how you present the state of language on the website as if it already has all the features noted there. And you seem to have different standards for feature completeness [1], while others expect the feature to be completely implemented, not just a proof of concept with tons of work still required. Again to clarify, I do like the idea behind this language and hope all the best for it. [1] https://twitter.com/8vit_devel/status/1141573808320647168 https://twitter.com/8vit_devel/status/1141573808320647168

kingkong2022 7y ago

Why is this downvoted? Everybody can go to the playground and see that most features are not implemented yet.

amedvednikov 7y ago
If by "most" you mean "one" (generics). OK. :D
- kingkong2022 7y ago
  So apart from all the other stuff mentioned in the thread, there is one more thing now. According to the docs, it is supposed to be released in july. But you already have it showcased in the home page since months. Wow!
  - amedvednikov 7y ago
    But I don't understand. You just said "most" of these don't work. Turns out "most" is 1. And you keep posting after this?
    - kingkong2022 7y ago
      Me & others have already listed out what things don't work. And you still keep posting after all that? Anyways, fuck off now. I don't care enough to reply to you. Neither do I care about the downvotes this comment is going to get because of telling you to do what you deserve. Lets just see how many the features you have on your homepage does your language come with after two days.