When I see lies repeated again and again, without being challenged, it angers me. You say "he did not confess in court". Followed by "I do not know whether he

When I see lies repeated again and again, without being challenged, it angers me. You say "he did not confess in court". Followed by "I do not know whether he confessed to any military staff". And yet you continue to claim that "he confessed". Chat logs are not a confession! It just boggles the mind that any sane person would consider "chat logs" a confession! Especially on a site like Hacker News. How would you like it if you were locked up in solitary based on what you said on IRC? So tell me, what is more inflammatory: The repeated lies by biased people who want to punish an INNOCENT man (remember "innocent until proven guilty"?) based on some stupid chat logs with a known felon; or calling out such lies?