4 ms·
While I am not a native speaker I am trying to wrap my head around if I said something really bad or why exactly you stopped reading. Where are problems was an
by ThomPete 7y ago
While I am not a native speaker I am trying to wrap my head around if I said something really bad or why exactly you stopped reading.
Where are problems was an attempt at saying it slightly more vague than where are the problems hiding. It was meant as an opener for the following breakdown of problems.
It could probably have been more eloquent or grammatically correct but I didn't think it would be a show stopper :)
Sorry, you feel that way I think it was an interesting exploration that at least got me to think about diversity and it's use as a business advantage quite differently.
- Jarwain 7y agoThe right way to say it is "Where are the problems?" (present tense), or "Where were the problems?" (past tense) The issue with "Were the problems?" is that it's grammatically incorrect on a level that makes it Really Hard to understand, if not totally ambiguous. I honestly didn't know what exactly you meant until I read your comment explaining it in the other chain. That said, I like the premise of the article, and how you break down the different types of problems. The idea that the value of diversity is in having different backgrounds, mindsets, and values which provide different perspectives is one that I share. Maybe for your future posts, consider pushing your text through Grammarly or another English grammar checker to clean up your prose. Solid grammar is a force multiplier when it comes to perceived quality and readability of a text (don't take this to mean Perfect grammar, though. I think an individual's voice shines through inconsequential grammar mistakes).