3 ms·
They don't actually meet the legal requirements of contractors. In CA, anyway, they'd have to be full time employees since they do the same thing every day, fu
by hashkb 7y ago
They don't actually meet the legal requirements of contractors. In CA, anyway, they'd have to be full time employees since they do the same thing every day, full time, they are required to be on-prem during dictated hours, and the business relies on their work (e.g. they can never finish their project.)
- otterley 7y agoThe moderators are employees of the contracted organization (Cognizant, in this case). They’re not employees of FB.
- hashkb 7y agoCognizant pays them hourly; they are referred to as "contractors" multiple times in the article, while the word "salary" does not appear.
- dragonwriter 7y agoHourly employees are still employees. Salary v. Hourly is completely different distinction from employee/contractor (you can have an hourly or fixed monthly/annual contract rate, and you can get either model as an employee, though salary is more common if your pay and working conditions make you an FLSA exempt employee, since otherwise you might need to be treated as hourly for overtime and certain other things anyway.)