4 ms·
1) erm, good luck with that. Why not just hash random strings you come across in that case? May I suggest a text to pick them from? 2) That isn't what the arti
by scottlocklin 7y ago
1) erm, good luck with that. Why not just hash random strings you come across in that case? May I suggest a text to pick them from?
2) That isn't what the article said. The article asserted "quantum computers" were uniquely and inherently excellent random number generators. I assert you can only say this if you never in your life interacted with matter, which is generally accurate when discussion "quantum information theorists" who come up with gorp like this.
- lisper 7y ago> Why not just hash random strings you come across in that case? Because your adversary could "come across" those same strings. Your entropy source has to be private (obviously). > That isn't what the article said The first sentence, is, quite literally, "Pure, verifiable randomness is hard to come by." And that is both false and unimportant.