I agree it's unsettled! My complaint is that the article treats the matter otherwise: only referring to "experts" who think a rising wage floor is overdue, and

I agree it's unsettled! My complaint is that the article treats the matter otherwise: only referring to "experts" who think a rising wage floor is overdue, and only quoting those with pro-price-control beliefs (like representatives of the large-labor-union-funded EPI). That's in keeping with the article's myopic, misleading, pandering headline that ignores over a century of pre-1938 precedent.