3 ms·
First, I feel this is a hand curated list of results (same with most of the "this does not exist" stuff). That being said it is very good. Pretty funny quotes:
by lettergram 7y ago
First, I feel this is a hand curated list of results (same with most of the "this does not exist" stuff). That being said it is very good. Pretty funny quotes:
> You might not think that a mumford brush would be a good filter for an Insta story.
They are definitely leaking some of their training data. Many of the names in the article are real people (which is concerning).
Working on synthetic data generation myself[1], this is not at all surprising. It's also why we are basically living in a "post-truth" world...
https://austingwalters.com/the-last-free-generation/ https://austingwalters.com/the-last-free-generation/
What do you do when anything can be synthetically created?
[1] https://medium.com/capital-one-tech/why-you-dont-necessarily-need-data-for-data-science-48d7bf503074 https://medium.com/capital-one-tech/why-you-dont-necessarily...
- kristintynski 7y agoIt is curated, but not heavily. I usually took the first result of the prompt. Occasionally i'd skip a result that was totally off, but all of them were the best out of the first 2-3 for any given prompt.