3 ms·
My money is on Paul Le Roux. He is a pragmatic programmer who wrote encryption software for Windows in the 90s and in the 2000s he had a real need to move money
by trixie_ 7y ago
My money is on Paul Le Roux. He is a pragmatic programmer who wrote encryption software for Windows in the 90s and in the 2000s he had a real need to move money around outside the traditional systems. Bitcoin was scrappy windows software as well like E4M. A lot of academics, open source activists and hacker purists would never write their software for Windows. Le Roux's writing style is similar, his attitude, streak for innovation, and timeline all kind of fit for a possible Satoshi candidate. He also had a real motive to be anonymous and release the software anonymously unlike many other candidates.
- sireat 7y agoPaul Le Roux is a promising candidate except for one thing: by 2009 he was running his crime empire branching in pretty much every direction possible. Would he have had time to write the software and also kick back to play the part of Satoshi? It would be interesting to compare the coding style in E4M and original BTC software. PS. Fascinating series of articles on Paul Le Roux: https://magazine.atavist.com/the-mastermind https://magazine.atavist.com/the-mastermind
- trixie_ 7y agoI think so. If you look at the total amount of code, his total emails and forum posts - there really isn't much. I wouldn't put it past him as a side project given his past. Also most of the code was done by the beginning of 2009 and he stopped posting at the end of 2010. It wasn't until 2012 he was arrested. Given that he was already wealthy and didn't need the attention - he had good reason to stay anonymous.