I don't understand your opposition to the name. The three body problem is so named Look at my first objection, that the problem described in the book has (at l

I don't understand your opposition to the name. The three body problem is so named Look at my first objection, that the problem described in the book has (at least) FOUR bodies. Yet the idea that it's a three-body problem is pervasive throughout the book. Surely that in itself is enough to justify some aggravation.