The Guardian article[1] provides more details. The case is a bit unusual, and thus the title may build wrong impression. In particular: - the donor/biologica

The Guardian article[1] provides more details. The case is a bit unusual, and thus the title may build wrong impression. In particular: - the donor/biological father brought the legal case - the pregnancy was performed through artificial insemination - the donor was the legal father according to the birth cerificate - the donor performed parental role - the donor wishes to retain parental rights - the mother wishes to move out of country with the child and a new partner The High Court ruling is available online [2], and also the earlier Family Court appeal is [3]. [1] https://www.theguardian.com/law/2019/jun/19/high-court-rules-sperm-donor-is-legal-father-of-child https://www.theguardian.com/law/2019/jun/19/high-court-rules... [2] http://eresources.hcourt.gov.au/downloadPdf/2019/HCA/21 http://eresources.hcourt.gov.au/downloadPdf/2019/HCA/21 [3] http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FamCAFC/2018/115.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FamCA..., linking to earlier FC rulings.