3 ms·
1) You'll notice I didn't put nuclear war in my list of existential threats. That's because it also will likely not cause human extinction. 2) We are probably
by akvadrako 7y ago
1) You'll notice I didn't put nuclear war in my list of existential threats. That's because it also will likely not cause human extinction.
2) We are probably already in a mass extinction event. That also has little change of causing human extinction - we're the most adaptable species this planet has ever seen.
- jbay808 7y agoDid you read the article I linked? It's not talking about the extinction of rhinos, tigers and polar bears. It's talking about the mechanics of the end-Permian mass extinction. To quote Wikipedia: "known colloquially as the Great Dying... approximately 252 million years ago. It is the Earth's most severe known extinction event, with up to 96% of all marine species and 70% of terrestrial vertebrate species becoming extinct." Seriously, it's a good article and quite short. I think you'd find it interesting food for thought and I'm honestly interested to hear your response to it, not some cheap dismissals. Edit: if you really don't have time to read the whole thing, at least let me know what you think of the figure on page 6