3 ms·
> He was banned because he was abusive and harassing, and en:wiki couldn't or wouldn't control it. That is a pro-Foundation stance. Fram was removed bypassing
by nsajko 7y ago
> He was banned because he was abusive and harassing, and en:wiki couldn't or wouldn't control it.
That is a pro-Foundation stance. Fram was removed bypassing all existing community processes while there are no public complaints against him and with no rationale or explanation. It seems like he was just removed for being rude. Also note that Fram was a critic of the foundation.
In any case, this is a truly weird change of behavior from the Wikimedia Foundation, considering that they previously ignored even child abuse from admins, leaving everything to Arbitration committees. Awful administrator abuse on hr.wikipedia.org, which dissolved its Arbitration committee and is literally run, written and micromanaged by illiterate Nazis (and I do not mean grammar-Nazi or something like that) who behave MUCH worse than Fram was ignored.
- mirimir 7y ago> ... there are no public complaints against him ... I gather that's because making complaints public would arguably identify those who had submitted them. And still, with that there's zero public accountability.
- DanBC 7y agoThere are people in the linked thread saying his behaviour is problematic but that he should get a pass because he makes so many edits -- this is precisely the toxic culture that the foundation is trying to end.