3 ms·
> considering the cultures are very similar India is far more multicultural (multiple religions, multiple ethnicities, multiple languages) than China. Easy ru
by smallnamespace 7y ago
> considering the cultures are very similar
India is far more multicultural (multiple religions, multiple ethnicities, multiple languages) than China.
Easy rule of thumb for the last 2 millennia of history: China has spent most of its time unified, while India hasn't.
- naruvimama 7y agoThat might actually be untrue. While India through out its history was ruled by countless small kingdoms, most of them were part of invisible empires and connected through marriage, alliance or principle. There were very few genocidal wars or wars of total annihilation. This strangely was a common problem not only in China but in Europe where loosing a war would mean total annihilation. This only came to an end in India with the Islamic invasion - whose strategy like in Persia or Mesopotamia consisted of raid, loot, murder and flee. When they found themselves more permanent rule it was mostly about conversion, taking slaves, destruction/defacement or appropriation(repurposing) of non-islamic buildings. It is like saying the Soviet was united and the EU was never. The Soviet was held together by force, the EU is held together by consent.