> you’re implying the detractor does not exist for the alternative. no? what kind of crazy dichotomic logic is that? you're way overthinking it. > Do you thi

> you’re implying the detractor does not exist for the alternative. no? what kind of crazy dichotomic logic is that? you're way overthinking it. > Do you think 99% of people who go to college moreover college output has a lot more variation than trade school output, so assuming that the proportions of outcome are the same is as well something that was never claimed. > You must understand you just dropping things I never said and argue as if I said them, how does one go and debate or understand that? it was never my point to begin with! jesus, 6 post ago I made one point: trade school aren't providing the titles one would go get to optimize for class mobility, heck, the rest isn't even a point of discussion really, the whole idea on which trade school are based on is to bake blue collar workers.