I mean, Tim Cook is basically coming out against companies that are following the law at least as much as Apple. People just don't like the way the laws are cu

I mean, Tim Cook is basically coming out against companies that are following the law at least as much as Apple. People just don't like the way the laws are currently setup. Apple even benefited from these lack of legal grounds in the past to get through their own privacy issues[4]. And it's not like Apple is innocent here. They've done illegal things in the past that directly hurt users [1] and it's employees and other people in the industry [2]. They have a long history of violating user trust [3]. This isn't to say they are unique in this. Most large companies deal with these sorts of things. But Apple isn't innocent. They just happen to find an area where they can claim to take the high ground because their business model allows it. [1] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-ebooks/apple-colluded-on-e-book-prices-judge-finds-idUSBRE9690GE20130710 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-ebooks/apple-collud... [2] https://www.cnet.com/news/apple-google-others-settle-anti-poaching-lawsuit-for-415-million/ https://www.cnet.com/news/apple-google-others-settle-anti-po... [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._litigation#In-app_purchases_class_action https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._litigation#In-app_p... [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._litigation#iPad_and_iPhone_privacy_issue_class_action https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._litigation#iPad_and... "The problem facing the plaintiffs is the current state of electronic privacy law, the issue being that there is no national privacy law that provides for compensatory damages for breach of privacy"