The journalistic objectivity of many of the online publishers has gotten worse and worse over the past 10 years in my opinion on all sides of the political spec

The journalistic objectivity of many of the online publishers has gotten worse and worse over the past 10 years in my opinion on all sides of the political spectrum. "Objectivity in journalism aims to help the audience make up their own mind about a story, providing the facts alone and then letting audiences interpret those on their own. To maintain objectivity in journalism, journalists should present the facts whether or not they like or agree with those facts. Objective reporting is meant to portray issues and events in a neutral and unbiased manner, regardless of the writers opinion or personal beliefs." Taken from - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalistic_objectivity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalistic_objectivity Then you have an article from Vox which highlights exactly my thoughts. "Most journalists are, whether they think of themselves this way or not, explainers. They are in the business of making sense of the torrent of information constantly deluging us all. That obviously can and does include an enormous range of journalists and an enormous range of voices, formats, and subjects. Some journalists prefer the “objective,” distanced tone that marked most journalism in the late 20th century. Some prefer to have a distinctive voice and perspective." That last sentence, at least in my opinion is where someone shifts from journalist to someone who is only trying to proselytize their worldview. Vox quote taken from this article - https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/12/7/18117404/advice-for-journalists-news-media https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/12/7/18117404/ad...