5 ms·
All of those are level 2 hypervisors. Hyper V is a level 1 hypervisor. My point is that it's fundamental to the way the tech works.
by damnyou 7y ago
All of those are level 2 hypervisors. Hyper V is a level 1 hypervisor.
My point is that it's fundamental to the way the tech works.
- stephenr 7y agoGreat, but that's a design decision Microsoft made when implementing a solution for desktops and workstations. Sure, a level 1 HV makes a lot of sense for a VM host. For this, not so much.
- Analemma_ 7y agoIt is a VM host: when Hyper-V is active, Windows itself is just another VM. (That's why you have to reboot when you turn Hyper-V on or off). NT isn't actually privileged compared to the Linux kernel in WSL2! Most likely in the next few years Hyper-V will become non-optional and Windows will always be virtualized when you run it. That's a big architectural shift that will enable lots of cool new scenarios, but it requires a level 1 hypervisor.
- WorldMaker 7y agoOne interesting rumor that has been around for years is that Xbox games could always start requiring Hyper-V on Windows. On an Xbox One, Hyper-V is already in charge and games (mostly) run in extremely lightweight VMs. Supposedly there is interest in bringing those game VMs directly to Windows for power-user game performance.
- stephenr 7y agoWhen I said “vm host” I meant a server in a rack. But sure, keep down voting because someone said your dumpster fire OS is crap.