> To call subcontracting "illegal" is a stretch. Legal does not equate to moral. The subcontracting going on here, illegal or not, is reprehensible because it

> To call subcontracting "illegal" is a stretch. Legal does not equate to moral. The subcontracting going on here, illegal or not, is reprehensible because it is exploitative. On top of that the rent-seeking itself is morally bankrupt. It's extracting something from others essentially for free. I'm a socialist, but only the worst kind of capitalist or libertarian would think this is ok.