5 ms·
A scan where you verify what the computer is telling you and cross checking it with what you're seeing could be. Maybe they have a UI showing the path the comp
by base698 7y ago
A scan where you verify what the computer is telling you and cross checking it with what you're seeing could be. Maybe they have a UI showing the path the computer is taking and bounding boxes of all the potential obstacles overlayed on the screen. If there is a disagreement the human takes over.
Similar to how if on an instrument approach the altitude doesn't agree with the vertical guidance. You can check other systems to see which instrument has failed and whether it's the vertical guidance or altimeter.
Of course, this method of driving and having to pay more attention doesn't jive with the fantasy of getting wasted and having a computer take you home.
- magduf 7y ago>Of course, this method of driving and having to pay more attention doesn't jive with the fantasy of getting wasted and having a computer take you home. Which is why the system you're describing will never come to cars: American drivers would never use it correctly. If it isn't something that complete morons can jump in and use with zero training, it's just not going to work here. What you're describing requires a competent pilot with training, and that's a completely unrealistic expectation for a car in America.
- JamesBarney 7y agoBut then what's the point of an autonomous car? I'd much rather drive than constantly be checking car instruments.
- base698 7y agoI'd rather not be decapitated due to a bug. Somewhere down the list is rather not checking instruments all the time.