3 ms·
>I've seen implementations without touch, and they're much, much less useful. What, exactly, are you doing with your infotainment system that requires so much
by navigatesol 7y ago
>I've seen implementations without touch, and they're much, much less useful.
What, exactly, are you doing with your infotainment system that requires so much use? I mean, I agree, CarPlay and Android Auto are nice, but I'm only playing music and using the navigation, both of which can be done easily without the fancy software.
>Most of us are used to being able to adjust the AC without looking
It's not merely that we are used to it, it's the entire purpose of the tactile interface: allowing you to adjust things while keeping your eyes on the road.
- ubermonkey 7y ago>What, exactly, are you doing with your infotainment system that requires so much use? I mean, I agree, CarPlay and Android Auto are nice, but I'm only playing music and using the navigation, both of which can be done easily without the fancy software. Wow, that's an impressive knee-jerk. First, you cast aspersions on the speaker by suggesting they're somehow using the feature too much if they care about interface efficacy. Then you insist that key functions are done just as easily the old way, by which I presume you mean "by looking at the phone." I'm not sure what your point is, but you're doing an admirable job at hollering at that cloud.