3 ms·
That means they would need to use new cones with transponders. Yes, it's more expensive, but also way more reliable.
by IgorPartola 7y ago
That means they would need to use new cones with transponders. Yes, it's more expensive, but also way more reliable.
- sosuke 7y agoAnd less likely to be stolen when the cones can be tracked.
- rayiner 7y agoSo when a police officer puts down a cone behind a broken down car in the freeway--??
- mikestew 7y agoThe cone that transmits to every vehicle within listening range: "don't hit me"?
- Balgair 7y agoAnd when all the cones' fancy electronics break or aren't charged? Is the cop just supposed to not stop? What about poorer jurisdictions that can't afford it?
- IgorPartola 7y agoAnd if the officer puts down a regular cone and the driver is texting and doesn't see it? Like, yes this would require changes to how we do things. Police officers will have to be careful to use the new style cones correctly. Is this any different than when they first started having use cones/flares? There is a price for every technology. I mean one of the alternatives is that we rely on the LIDAR being so good as to not hit the car and the officer standing next to it because it recognizes that situation. Which it will. Most of the time. Until it doesn't. Seems to be that having the transceiver and LIDAR backup is better than fancy expensive LIDAR.
- rayiner 7y agoWhat if it's just a regular cone, like lots of people carry in their trunk?
- pjc50 7y agoStealing that transponder code would be hilarious - place invisible virtual cones wherever you like! (Seriously, cones really ought to be dealt with by image recognition? Easiest possible case, an object specifically designed to be seen?)
- sthgrau 7y agoI can see the 007 getaway now. With a press of the button, a bunch of tiny transponders are thrown on the road. The bad guy's cars automatically brake because they can't find a way to get around the new obstacles. Another press of the button dispenses a martini.
- kazinator 7y agoNot just any transponders: transponders that never fail or run out of battery juice, and are never subject to RF interference from anything.
- plankers 7y agoThe detection of the cones isn't the problem. The software properly identified that there were cones near the roadway, that's why it stopped. The really hard problem is programming decision-making logic that will properly ignore cones that aren't in the roadway, 100 times out of 100. I used to do QA for the Waymo cars, and boy do they get worked into a tizzy if there's any kind of construction going on. It was the most common situation for remote assistance (read: people sitting in a room sending pathfinding suggestions) to get involved. Judging from some of these comments, the problem is still very difficult.