> The products and services we provide will use the least amount of energy and material resources possible. The wording is unfortunate, but I understand this t

> The products and services we provide will use the least amount of energy and material resources possible. The wording is unfortunate, but I understand this to mean that tools (e.g. programming languages) should be chosen with resource usage in mind. The last word, "possible", gives you an out to reasonably argue that C is not an option because of other concerns like security. But it sure means that something like Go or Rust should be preferred over something like Ruby or PHP because it allows you to run most applications on a much smaller footprint.