3 ms·
I rather like these two: http://www.stlport.org/resources/StepanovUSA.html http://www.stlport.org/resources/StepanovUSA.html I find OOP technically unsoun
by tbrownaw 16y ago
I rather like these two:
http://www.stlport.org/resources/StepanovUSA.html http://www.stlport.org/resources/StepanovUSA.html
I find OOP technically unsound. ...
I find OOP philosophically unsound. ...
I find OOP methodologically wrong. ...
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/The-DCI-Architecture http://www.infoq.com/presentations/The-DCI-Architecture (at around 39:30)
You cannot do object-oriented programming in Java.
What the first calls OOP, the second calls "class-oriented programming". What the second calls proper OOP, I think is more along the lines of what the first advocates.
- jberryman 16y agoIt seems like what he is arguing for (a methodology that starts with algorithms and generalizes an interface) is what type classes (at least in Haskell) offer.