4 ms·
If python & Qt is an option, then why not (modern) C++ & Qt? Genuine question. QBasic was my first programming language, and I learned C++ only during universi
by archi42 7y ago
If python & Qt is an option, then why not (modern) C++ & Qt?
Genuine question. QBasic was my first programming language, and I learned C++ only during university. Looking at older code at my job I think I'm lucky to have missed a lot of language-uglyness (we have some legacy code samples that are basically some compiler-specific dialect of C89; feels totally different than C++11).
- RantyDave 7y agoModern C++ is a big jump in the right direction, but you still have to compile and link it.
- pjmlp 7y agoStill it is not so bad on Windows with either C++ Builder or Visual C++, with all incremental options turned on. Other platforms never invested that much in C++ build performance. In any case, hopefully modules will make it better.