3 ms·
That makes sense for the values, but the names of rows and columns are also passed as bytes. Wouldn't a convenience function that accepts strings, performs the
by biot 16y ago
That makes sense for the values, but the names of rows and columns are also passed as bytes. Wouldn't a convenience function that accepts strings, performs the Bytes.toBytes() conversion and calls the original method reduce code clutter?
- ddlatham 16y agoThe same thing applies to rows and columns. We don't use any simple strings for our row or column indexes. They are serialized objects. Earlier versions of the API actually did have String based versions, and were changed to just byte arrays to reduce clutter.
- biot 16y agoInteresting, that makes sense then.