3 ms·

So now I am a wumao right? If someone disagrees with the Western media, just say he/she is a wumao and you automatically win, how convenient. The image in your

So now I am a wumao right? If someone disagrees with the Western media, just say he/she is a wumao and you automatically win, how convenient. The image in your link makes me laugh. I can do the same, just get an image of an Amazon fulfillment center and say it is holding thousands of supporters of Edward Snowden against their will. > I dunno, you tell me. Because we don't arrest people for their religions. It's not just 31 people btw. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_2009_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_riots https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_2009_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_rio... If you don't think your media could lie, there is nothing I can do.

tempguy9999 7y ago
> So now I am a wumao right? Odd. Most westerners wouldn't have that word to hand. I myself was trying and failing to remember it. But to answer the question, I asked, I did not accuse. And you did not answer. Why? > The image in your link makes me laugh You asked for evidence. It's evidence, not proof because pix can be faked, I agree. But anything I put in front of you you can dismiss as fake so what can I do - specifically, what do you want? > Because we don't arrest people for their religions. Seems you do, and put them in giant camps. And you explained why with all the links you post. > it's not just 31 people btw Re this link, of course it's more than 6, but the link you gave was to that specific attack in which 6 people were killed. Which I acknowledged. Don't fudge things. And you have not denied that the crackdown on Uighurs occurred, and you yourself gave the reason why - so you don't deny any of this. I don't think you are thinking for yourself, as you suggest me of not doing, and you have not said who you work for. Which is interesting.
- dang 7y ago
  I don't mean to pick on you personally at all, but I have to reply to you a third time in this thread. This comment not only broke the site guidelines terribly, it became aggressive enough to count as harrassment. You simply can't bully another user like that on HN. We ban people for that. Let's look at the larger picture for a minute. Geopolitics between China and the West have taken a polarizing turn. Hacker News' audience is highly international but majority Western, so most users here identify with one side of the story. That's natural, but it means that people representing the other side are in a minority position. No matter how wrong you think their position is, you and other HN users need to treat the people you're arguing with respectfully. Otherwise we get a mob dynamic, which is vastly more destructive to HN than comments being wrong about China—and unfortunately there has been a lot of it lately. HN users who have a Chinese background, or have lived in China and so on, have a right to present their side of the story without being accused of being spies or foreign agents and run out of town. The site guidelines ask you to "assume good faith" for good reason: when people don't, it turns a functioning community into a tire fire. Our experience with the issue of astroturfing is that internet users are all too eager to imagine it about commenters they just happen to disagree with. Having imagined it they then feel entitled to sling the accusation to twist the knife a bit further in an argument. That's not ok. If you're genuinely concerned about abuse, email hn@ycombinator.com so we can look into it. But it's not ok to casually insinuate it in the threads: most of the time there's no evidence for it, and the accusation is a powerful poison in its own right. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the spirit of this site when posting here, we'd be grateful.
  - deleted 7y ago
    [deleted]

tempguy9999 7y ago

> So now I am a wumao right? Odd. Most westerners wouldn't have that word to hand. I myself was trying and failing to remember it. But to answer the question, I asked, I did not accuse. And you did not answer. Why? > The image in your link makes me laugh You asked for evidence. It's evidence, not proof because pix can be faked, I agree. But anything I put in front of you you can dismiss as fake so what can I do - specifically, what do you want? > Because we don't arrest people for their religions. Seems you do, and put them in giant camps. And you explained why with all the links you post. > it's not just 31 people btw Re this link, of course it's more than 6, but the link you gave was to that specific attack in which 6 people were killed. Which I acknowledged. Don't fudge things. And you have not denied that the crackdown on Uighurs occurred, and you yourself gave the reason why - so you don't deny any of this. I don't think you are thinking for yourself, as you suggest me of not doing, and you have not said who you work for. Which is interesting.

dang 7y ago
I don't mean to pick on you personally at all, but I have to reply to you a third time in this thread. This comment not only broke the site guidelines terribly, it became aggressive enough to count as harrassment. You simply can't bully another user like that on HN. We ban people for that. Let's look at the larger picture for a minute. Geopolitics between China and the West have taken a polarizing turn. Hacker News' audience is highly international but majority Western, so most users here identify with one side of the story. That's natural, but it means that people representing the other side are in a minority position. No matter how wrong you think their position is, you and other HN users need to treat the people you're arguing with respectfully. Otherwise we get a mob dynamic, which is vastly more destructive to HN than comments being wrong about China—and unfortunately there has been a lot of it lately. HN users who have a Chinese background, or have lived in China and so on, have a right to present their side of the story without being accused of being spies or foreign agents and run out of town. The site guidelines ask you to "assume good faith" for good reason: when people don't, it turns a functioning community into a tire fire. Our experience with the issue of astroturfing is that internet users are all too eager to imagine it about commenters they just happen to disagree with. Having imagined it they then feel entitled to sling the accusation to twist the knife a bit further in an argument. That's not ok. If you're genuinely concerned about abuse, email hn@ycombinator.com so we can look into it. But it's not ok to casually insinuate it in the threads: most of the time there's no evidence for it, and the accusation is a powerful poison in its own right. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the spirit of this site when posting here, we'd be grateful.
- deleted 7y ago
  [deleted]