3 ms·
My point was that you clearly think they need more oversight, have skewed the question a little towards invoking that answer, and I can't see many people at all
by tempguy9999 7y ago
My point was that you clearly think they need more oversight, have skewed the question a little towards invoking that answer, and I can't see many people at all suggest, after 2 planefuls of people are killed, that boeing should be allowed any self-cert rights.
- samcday 7y agoI was trying to just state the facts, and pointed out ways to interpret this current piece as over-hyped. I also tried to not paint a graphic picture of what the "MAX controversies" even were, in order to avoid appeals to emotion. Let me try and reframe my original comment for you. I do currently think that Boeing should be regulated more, but I'm not convinced enough of my own reasons. So I'm wondering whether my perspective would change if I heard compelling alternate ones?
- tempguy9999 7y agoAh, I now understand. Looking for opposing views to test yours against is very commendable and wise. And quite uncommon. I can't really help you as I agree too strongly - see my other comment elsewhere re. stress testing. I can't see any possible reason. The only people reliably who might answer that things are ok as-is are boeing themselves.