3 ms·
40 is XL, not XXXX. "King XL" is rejected (and sounds like a condom brand)
by williamdclt 7y ago
40 is XL, not XXXX. "King XL" is rejected (and sounds like a condom brand)
- yorwba 7y agoOk, it seems like they only recognize subtractive notation. Nonetheless, numbers from L onward seem to work, so if you want that distinct "roman numeral" look, you could choose "King LXVII".
- ratmice 7y agoFor some reason i would be suprised if they check for unicode roman numerals, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerals_in_Unicode#Roman_numerals https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerals_in_Unicode#Roman_nume...
- yorwba 7y agoThey don't check for them, they just forcibly convert them into ASCII by taking the lowest byte of the Unicode code point, turning "ⅠⅡⅢⅣⅤⅥⅦⅧⅨⅩⅪⅫⅬⅭⅮⅯⅰⅱⅲⅳⅴⅵⅶⅷⅸⅹⅺⅻⅼⅽⅾⅿ" into "`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~\x7f". A few of these characters get rejected, though curiously not the last one, which is nonprintable.