4 ms·
Quite interesting but it doesn't seem very intuitive, I read the article and still am not sure what it is trying to explain and what the value add is. It seems
by kerng 7y ago
Quite interesting but it doesn't seem very intuitive, I read the article and still am not sure what it is trying to explain and what the value add is. It seems a bit complicated and qualitative.
I'm super interested in ways to map risk and security. Or measuring maturity of a security team or organization - so was wondering that these Wardley maps might be something to look into? Anybody with more experience know if that would be worth it? I find graphs pretty useful to represent security and risks.
- abiro 7y agoMapping is definitely a qualitative and often subjective process! There is never one correct map, there are only useful maps. I think the key takeaways from the post are: 1. Always anchor discussions in user needs 2. Analyze crypto in the context of the broader economy 3. Plan for evolution 4. Wardley maps are really helpful at all of the above I've also written a follow up post detailing some of the strategic mistakes cryptocurrency projects make and how they can be avoided using maps: https://agost.blog/2019/06/mapping-crypto-common-pitfalls/ https://agost.blog/2019/06/mapping-crypto-common-pitfalls/ Edit: I'm not familiar with applying mapping for security, but these look like some good resources: https://community.wardleymaps.com/t/tackling-security-with-wardley-maps/76/3 https://community.wardleymaps.com/t/tackling-security-with-w...
- kerng 7y agoThanks, appreciate the reply and additional info! Will spend some time looking into this more!