I’m familiar with these positions (static types, ADT, parsing, etc). But my comment on “less surprising” was meant for Python; it turned out that you can get pr

I’m familiar with these positions (static types, ADT, parsing, etc). But my comment on “less surprising” was meant for Python; it turned out that you can get pretty far with it with no static types nor ADT. So it’s very possible that Go can fare not too badly. The reason why I wondered about Go is because I’ve seen several HN posts about using Go for writing parsers/compilers with surprisingly ok result. (I don’t advocate dropping static types or ADT; just that in the spirit of this blog post, it might be worthwhile to examining our assumptions.)