3 ms·
You just argued below that if I had bad economic impact based on the FACT that you called me a racist that I should be able to sue you over this very honest deb
by elicash 7y ago
You just argued below that if I had bad economic impact based on the FACT that you called me a racist that I should be able to sue you over this very honest debate and win. You've taken a very extreme position here. At least one person, you, are arguing this. So don't say "nobody."
- mullingitover 7y agoThat's not an extreme position, it's the law of the land and has been for a long time. It's basic civil law that if you harm someone they can take you to court to be made whole. Civilization is sort of built on this concept. The thing here is that you're not being harmed by rhetoric. If you were, you'd have a case.
- elicash 7y ago> If you were, you'd have a case. So if Eli Cash was my actual name (rather than a Royal Tenenbaums character), and if I didn't get a job because the employer googled my name and your claim came up..? You really think I'd have a real case? I guess if we still disagree nothing can be done about that. We've both made our points.
- mullingitover 7y ago> So if Eli Cash was my actual name (rather than a Royal Tenenbaums character), and if I didn't get a job because the employer googled my name and your claim came up..? You really think I'd have a real case? Would a reasonable person read my post in context and somehow walk away believing you were a racist? You know they wouldn't.