4 ms·
>I don't think simply calling somebody "racist" should EVER be libel. Even when inaccurate. So, what is your definition for libel? As it doesn't appear to be t
by inflatableDodo 7y ago
>I don't think simply calling somebody "racist" should EVER be libel. Even when inaccurate.
So, what is your definition for libel? As it doesn't appear to be the same one in common usage. I am massively in favour of free speech, but I suspect even Voltaire would want some method of restitution to be available should people be spreading lies about him around town.
- elicash 7y ago> spreading lies about him around town Whether something is libel and unprotected would obviously depend on the lie. We seem to agree about that so I'm not sure what you're claiming I believe.
- inflatableDodo 7y agoI actually think that it depends pretty much completely on the context. There is no list of phrases that are innocent or malicious in and of themselves. Something that can seem innoccuous in most situations can be a matter of life or death in others. So no, I don't think we seem to agree. And could you answer the question rather than dancing around it?