>The social scientists do everything for Grant money. That's a very absolute statement. The social scientists do everything for Grant money. Do you have some s

>The social scientists do everything for Grant money. That's a very absolute statement. The social scientists do everything for Grant money. Do you have some sort of data to back that up? I mean in a way it is true that research can only be conducted if there is Grant money but that should be true for all of the sciences. >Foundations don't give grant money to figure out the truth. They get grant money to get someone to make some scientific sounding propaganda that supports whatever narrative they're pushing. This might be true sometimes but do you think it is true for the majority of research? Not all foundations even have a "narrative" as far as I can tell. >Who comes up with the narrative to push though, and why? Isn't that a weirdly open question to ask at the end of a very assertive statement?