4 ms·
The are definitely merits: fingerprinting protection, containers, less memory usage, soon a state-of-the-art parallel rendering engine (Webrender), soon-to-be b
by feanaro 7y ago
The are definitely merits: fingerprinting protection, containers, less memory usage, soon a state-of-the-art parallel rendering engine (Webrender), soon-to-be better adblockers, etc. More novel things will trickle down from Servo in the future.
It's unclear to me Chromium is still significantly faster in any meaningful way. They certainly feel roughly the same.
- elagost 7y agoIf I asked my dad what the technical merits of Chrome or Firefox were or why he used what he used, he wouldn't have an answer for me. He'd say "I use Chrome because you told me a few years ago to use it and it still works." The reason we switched from IE was because IE just straight up did not work. Sites were broken. Now it doesn't really matter but for these invisible things that normal people don't see or care about. Most people are like my dad.
- feanaro 7y agoWell, simply correct your mistake and tell him to switch. Or even better, configure it for him. I've done so for all of my "like your dad" people. Perhaps sites aren't as broken in Chrome now as they were with IE, but you can bet the web itself will change in ways you and I would consider broken if Google is left to become the sole, unchecked steward and helmsman of the web.
- MikusR 7y agoI never migrated from Firefox to Chrome, but Firefox has been in a constant state of "soon we will be faster/better than Chrome" for almost 10 years.
- feanaro 7y agoThis was definitely the case in the first few years after Chrome was first released and, to some degree, even after, up to the Firefox Quantum release. I don't think this is true anymore even in an objective, measured sense, though I haven't checked recently. However, Chrome is definitely not (to me) perceptibly faster anymore, though. In what way do you still feel Chrome is better/faster?