3 ms·

Thanks. My assumptions are imprecise, because as I mentioned I am no academic. So I appreciate your correction. To make the post stronger, replace assumption 3

Thanks. My assumptions are imprecise, because as I mentioned I am no academic. So I appreciate your correction. To make the post stronger, replace assumption 3 with "All of the mathematical rules which underlie physics are computable." IMO, this doesn't materially affect the plausibility of these assumptions.

YeGoblynQueenne 7y ago
>> "All of the mathematical rules which underlie physics are computable." I really have to ask- what are those mathematical rules that underlie physics and how do you know that they are computable?
- asdfasgasdgasdg 7y ago
  All of chemistry and physics as far as we're aware are described by mathematical rules that can be computed. Things like the strong and weak forces, gravity, etc. all have mathematical descriptions. There may be other, non-computable aspects to physics, but I am not aware of them if so.
  - deleted 7y ago
    [deleted]
  - YeGoblynQueenne 7y ago
    >> There may be other, non-computable aspects to physics, but I am not aware of them if so. In that case, what do you base your assumption (3) on?
    - asdfasgasdgasdg 7y ago
      Let's consolidate this discussion into the other thread, since it seems like you're offering the same objections here and there. :)