3 ms·

> H&M is not "the beast". On the topic of sustainability it's probably warranted to call them "the beast". Fast fashion companies are a big part of the problem

by dewey 7y ago

> H&M is not "the beast". On the topic of sustainability it's probably warranted to call them "the beast". Fast fashion companies are a big part of the problem if you look up how much water and resources are needed to produce a single piece of clothing. Of course having cheap clothing is great for the consumer in the short-term the same way that flying short distance instead of taking the train is comfortable, or commuting with a car instead of public transport. Their clothing recycling program falls under the definition of green washing. https://observer.com/2018/03/hm-sustainability-conscious-exclusive-collection/ https://observer.com/2018/03/hm-sustainability-conscious-exc...

bubblewrap 7y ago
I don't see where in the article they show it is green washing? They only mention some criticism H&M received, including the ridiculous uproar about the "coolest monkey" T-Shirt. If that is proof for green washing, it is not very convincing. Fast fashion - it depends on how much gets thrown away at the end of the day? Just because clothing has a heavy toll on the environment, doesn't mean companies producing it are evil. Toll on the environment or not, people need clothes.
- dewey 7y ago
  > Just because clothing has a heavy toll on the environment, doesn't mean companies producing it are evil. Toll on the environment or not, people need clothes. It sounds like you are taking this for granted and something that can't be changed. In fact there are a lot of initiatives and companies that work on reducing the footprint, using sustainable sources of cotton, paying fair wages, using less harmful dying methods and filtering the water used in production. If you are interested in the topic I'd suggest to start with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_fashion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_fashion. As for the green washing, there are probably better sources ([1], [2]) for that but you'll find enough if you do a little research yourself. [1] https://ecowarriorprincess.net/2018/08/can-hm-ever-be-sustainable/ https://ecowarriorprincess.net/2018/08/can-hm-ever-be-sustai... [2] https://wellmadeclothes.com/articles/HMConsciousCollectionIsGreenwashing101/ https://wellmadeclothes.com/articles/HMConsciousCollectionIs...
  - bubblewrap 7y ago
    That's all nice and well, but I am not convinced that it scales yet to a level where you can say anybody not doing it like that is evil. In any case, if you decide on that logic, everybody who shops at HM is evil, too. At very basic level: have these "sustainable fashion" people figured out a way to grow cotton with less energy and less pollution? If not, they don't really have a solution for anything. If they have, they will probably prevail on the market anyway, without the "fair" marketing. And the use of "fair" usually just implies that some people want to make the rules. I honestly don't care for that label, at least when it is used in marketing. In my opinion fair prices can only be determined by markets (with externalizations being paid for via laws).

by dewey 7y ago

bubblewrap 7y ago

I don't see where in the article they show it is green washing? They only mention some criticism H&M received, including the ridiculous uproar about the "coolest monkey" T-Shirt. If that is proof for green washing, it is not very convincing. Fast fashion - it depends on how much gets thrown away at the end of the day? Just because clothing has a heavy toll on the environment, doesn't mean companies producing it are evil. Toll on the environment or not, people need clothes.

dewey 7y ago
> Just because clothing has a heavy toll on the environment, doesn't mean companies producing it are evil. Toll on the environment or not, people need clothes. It sounds like you are taking this for granted and something that can't be changed. In fact there are a lot of initiatives and companies that work on reducing the footprint, using sustainable sources of cotton, paying fair wages, using less harmful dying methods and filtering the water used in production. If you are interested in the topic I'd suggest to start with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_fashion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_fashion. As for the green washing, there are probably better sources ([1], [2]) for that but you'll find enough if you do a little research yourself. [1] https://ecowarriorprincess.net/2018/08/can-hm-ever-be-sustainable/ https://ecowarriorprincess.net/2018/08/can-hm-ever-be-sustai... [2] https://wellmadeclothes.com/articles/HMConsciousCollectionIsGreenwashing101/ https://wellmadeclothes.com/articles/HMConsciousCollectionIs...
- bubblewrap 7y ago
  That's all nice and well, but I am not convinced that it scales yet to a level where you can say anybody not doing it like that is evil. In any case, if you decide on that logic, everybody who shops at HM is evil, too. At very basic level: have these "sustainable fashion" people figured out a way to grow cotton with less energy and less pollution? If not, they don't really have a solution for anything. If they have, they will probably prevail on the market anyway, without the "fair" marketing. And the use of "fair" usually just implies that some people want to make the rules. I honestly don't care for that label, at least when it is used in marketing. In my opinion fair prices can only be determined by markets (with externalizations being paid for via laws).