> It's absolutely not a good look for "well, we have `open()`!" to be the poster child of the JS stdlib. ...which it isn't, given that the "fs" module has a wi

> It's absolutely not a good look for "well, we have `open()`!" to be the poster child of the JS stdlib. ...which it isn't, given that the "fs" module has a wide variety of features much beyond an equivalent to open().