> False positives are a lot more damaging to a company compared to false negatives. People say this, and then they whine about how they can't find good candida

> False positives are a lot more damaging to a company compared to false negatives. People say this, and then they whine about how they can't find good candidates, can't find diverse candidates, etc. They could, of course, study interviewing, treat it with the same level of seriousness you might apply to other skills, and actually learn how to evaluate people with a pretty good level of accuracy so you can avoid both problems.