That's true in a literal sense since the article was from the 1950s. I'm mainly speaking to today's politics. > The rest of your post is pseudoscientific woo a

That's true in a literal sense since the article was from the 1950s. I'm mainly speaking to today's politics. > The rest of your post is pseudoscientific woo about natural "cycles". Please enlighten me on what "real science" is then. If there are no cycles in the climate, is it purely driven by randomness, exponential or asymptotic growth? How did Earth's climate even get into a state of stasis? Why do ice ages & warm periods occur & cycle back? Why/how do warming & cooling trends eventually reverse? Does science not utilize models? Is there not experiments & observations to back up models? What about the Philosophy of Science? Does our preconceptions influence how we model phenomena?