You cited a publication called "Intelligence Is the Best Predictor of Job Performance", but funnily enough there's also one called "Intelligence Is Not the Best

You cited a publication called "Intelligence Is the Best Predictor of Job Performance", but funnily enough there's also one called "Intelligence Is Not the Best Predictor of Job Performance", which one year later claims that the former one is flawed. There's also this: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557354/, which says "Supporters of IQ testing have been quick to point to correlations between IQ and job performance as evidence of test validity. A closer look at the data and results, however, suggests a rather murkier picture." > The skill acquired by a low IQ in five years is often surpassed by a high IQ person with a few months of experience. This looks wrong to me, most things take more than a few months to learn.