4 ms·
> proprietary code ... What's supposed to be the difference here? The difference is that GPL is claiming to not be proprietary...
by rmtech 7y ago
> proprietary code ... What's supposed to be the difference here?
The difference is that GPL is claiming to not be proprietary...
- icebraining 7y agoWhich is why you don't need to ask for permission, just follow the license.
- rmtech 7y agoIf you're a business, the license effectively says "you can't use this software" though, because as discussed previously it makes all the software that it touches into GPL software so you can't sell it, which is the point of a business.
- icebraining 7y agoYou can sell GPL software. It paid my salary for years.
- rmtech 7y agoI don't understand?
- icebraining 7y agoWhat is there to understand? We sold GPL licensed extensions to a GPL application, and made money. All perfectly valid under the license: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.en.html https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.en.html