3 ms·
Lately there's been a lot of relicensing stories this year, mongodb[1] being the one I thought of first. It seems like the GPL is just a way for groups to prote
by elagost 7y ago
Lately there's been a lot of relicensing stories this year, mongodb[1] being the one I thought of first. It seems like the GPL is just a way for groups to protect their own assets without getting ripped off, and more permissive licenses (BSD, MIT) don't give the creator of that software the same protection. However, if you do violate the GPL and release a closed-source product, who's to tell? Who will know? Always struck me as weird.
[1] https://www.zdnet.com/article/its-mongodbs-turn-to-change-its-open-source-license/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/its-mongodbs-turn-to-change-it...
- kemitchell 7y agoA number of organizations are actively involved in GPL enforcement. The most active these days is probably gpl-violations.org, in Europe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gpl-violations.org https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gpl-violations.org