> See my other post[1] for the technical reasons NAT doesn't actually provide security. You're just as wrong now as you were then, see my up-thread post to cor

> See my other post[1] for the technical reasons NAT doesn't actually provide security. You're just as wrong now as you were then, see my up-thread post to correct your misunderstanding about security. Edit: either direct addressing isn't possible with NAT, which provides security benefits, or it is possible, which means your complaint is mis-placed. It cannot simultaneously prevent direct addressing and provide literally no security benefit.